Perl, PCRE, Boost, and std::regex do not support the \uFFFF syntax. They use \x{FFFF} instead. You can omit leading zeros in the hexadecimal number between the curly braces. Since \x by itself is not a valid regex token, \x{1234} can never be confused to match \x 1234 times. It always matches the Unicode code point U+1234. \x{1234}{5678} will try to match code point U+1234 exactly 5678 times.
In Java, the regex token \uFFFF only matches the specified code point, even when you turned on canonical equivalence. However, the same syntax \uFFFF is also used to insert Unicode characters into literal strings in the Java source code. Pattern.compile("\u00E0") will match both the single-code-point and double-code-point encodings of à, while Pattern.compile("\\u00E0") matches only the single-code-point version. Remember that when writing a regex as a Java string literal, backslashes must be escaped. The former Java code compiles the regex à, while the latter compiles \u00E0. Depending on what you're doing, the difference may be significant.
JavaScript, which does not offer any Unicode support through its RegExp class, does support \uFFFF for matching a single Unicode code point as part of its string syntax.
没有评论:
发表评论
注意:只有此博客的成员才能发布评论。